Tanishka Wagh

Proof by Deceit

'Proof by Deceit' A unique challenge that went beyond conventional math competitions by pitting two teams against each other in a mind-bending face-off. In a four-round showdown, where Team A and Team B engage in a battle of deception and deduction. Team A presents mathematical statements to prove, while Team B endeavors to prove them using false statements. The twist? Team B must be cunning in their deceit, while Team A must be sharp to catch it. Points were awarded for successful proofs and the ability to spot deception, making it a thrilling test of mathematical acumen and strategic thinking.Throughout the event, each round presents unique challenges, testing the teams' creativity and logical reasoning Let's take a look at some of the statements our participants cooked fiery exchanges over!In Round 1,  From proving the existence of 0 to unraveling the paradoxical statement, teams faced an array of intriguing propositions. Round 2 introduced challenges ranging from proving the rationality of π to the surreal notion of imaginary negative integers. As the competition progressed to Round 3, teams had to confront practical scenarios, such as determining optimal seating arrangements and estimating distances in pursuit scenarios, adding a practical dimension to the intellectual battle. Finally, Round 4 delves into the philosophical concept of heap and the mathematical conundrum of potato percentages and rubiks cube theorem pushing the boundaries of mathematical reasoning to new heights.

Central to the event's dynamics were the ultraxioms, a set of propositions regarded as axioms irrespective of their truthfulness. These ultraxioms guide the interpretation and resolution of the given mathematical paradoxes, adding an extra layer of complexity to the competition! From the principle of authority to the variable illogicality of unity, each ultraxiom shapes the participants' strategies and arguments, blurring the lines between truth and deception.'Proof by Deceit' epitomizes the vibrant spirit of the math society, where intellect meets an unending will to put forth a captivating event. Through four rounds of deception and deduction, participants showcased their ingenuity, unraveling paradoxes and exploring philosophical conundrums. Guided by ultraxioms, they navigated the complexities of mathematical reasoning with zeal and collaboration.

As the competition concludes, it leaves a lasting legacy of innovation and camaraderie, reminding us of the boundless possibilities when minds unite in pursuit of mathematical truth.